Home | Northeast Times | The battle in the 169th district is heating up

The battle in the 169th district is heating up

By
Font size: Decrease font Enlarge font
Republican challenger Dave Kralle and Democratic state Rep. Ed Neilson are competing for a House district likely to move York County in two years. MARIA POUCHNIKOVA / TIMES PHOTOS Republican challenger Dave Kralle and Democratic state Rep. Ed Neilson are competing for a House district likely to move York County in two years. MARIA POUCHNIKOVA / TIMES PHOTOS

The clock is ticking on the 169th Legislative District being based in the Northeast.

The Legislative Reapportionment Commission has voted to move the district to a fast-growing area of York County. The new maps have been appealed to the Pennsylvania Supreme Court.

The winner of the Nov. 6 contest between Democratic state Rep. Ed Neilson and Republican challenger Dave Kralle will likely serve only two years before the seat moves.

Both candidates hope to keep the seat in the Northeast. Rep. Denny O’Brien long held the seat before vacating it in January to join City Council.

Neilson, 49, of Millbrook, a former political director of the local electricians union and a former official in Gov. Ed Rendell’s administration, was director of government relations and business development at Chartwell Law Offices when he decided to enter the race.

Kralle, 26, of Normandy, was an aide to O’Brien.

In an April special election, Neilson defeated Kralle with 54.1 percent of the vote. He was unopposed in the Democratic primary. Kralle won the Republican primary, setting up the rematch.

In an effort to keep the 169th district local, Neilson submitted testimony to the reapportionment commission and met with Republican and Democratic legislative leaders.

“I met with both sides of the aisle from day one up there to lobby to keep this district,” he said.

Neilson told Republican House Speaker Sam Smith that he’s doesn’t blindly vote with his party in Harrisburg and that the GOP would do better to move another district, if Philadelphia is to lose a district.

In addition, he cited population trends in the last decade.

“The 169th increased in population,” he said.

The state Supreme Court already has rejected the commission’s first set of maps, requiring the 2012 races to be held using lines drawn 10 years ago. That decision should help Democrats cut into Senate Republicans’ advantage and win back some House seats that the GOP took in the 2010 Republican wave election.

Still, Republicans are expected to hold both the Senate and House, and Kralle thinks he’d be the better lobbyist to keep the 169th in the Northeast, if the court again throws out the maps.

Kralle also contends that he’d be a better legislator than Neilson, who serves in the minority party.

“It’s important that I get elected because my party will be in the majority the next two years. We need somebody in Harrisburg who can use those two years effectively,” he said.

If the Supreme Court accepts the maps, Kralle’s home would be located in the 173rd district, represented by Democratic Rep. Mike McGeehan.

Neilson’s home would be in the 174th district, represented by Democratic Rep. John Sabatina Jr. He declined to speculate on a possible showdown with Sabatina in the 2014 primary.

“One election at a time,” he said.

The rematch does not seem to have the excitement level of the special election, but both men say they are active on the campaign trail.

Neilson won’t run cable television commercials this time, but he’ll send out up to five mailings. When not in Harrisburg, he’s meeting voters at their doorsteps and at the St. Martha carnival.

“Every night, I’m home, I’m out,” he said.

Kralle understands his uphill climb. He has no commitments of strong financial support from the House Republican Campaign Committee, though Reps. Mike Vereb and Bill Adolph have helped him. He held a $35 per person fund-raiser at Paddy Whacks Irish Sports Pub last month.

Neilson has an easier time raising money as an incumbent and has served about 1,700 constituents. He has helped citizens receive unclaimed money from the state treasury department. He and his staff met with senior citizen groups in the summer and held a recent senior fair at Penn-Crisp Gym. He attracted a big crowd to Archbishop Ryan High School in August for an outdoor screening of the movie The Three Stooges.

“It’s more challenging,” Kralle acknowledged. “I don’t have a district office where I can serve constituents.”

Kralle was given a good chance to win the special election, but believes some late negatives from his opponents helped lead to his defeat. He vows to keep his clean-campaign pledge, saying that it’s important to maintain the integrity of the political process even if it does not lead to victory.

“It’s something every candidate ought to take seriously,” he said.

Kralle has been knocking on doors in between taking three classes at Penn to finish his master’s degree in public administration.

The challenger is buoyed by earning an endorsement from International Association of Fire Fighters Local 22. The union backed Neilson in the special election.

“That’s a great endorsement to have,” Kralle said.

Kralle opposes Mayor Michael Nutter’s decision to appeal Local 22’s contract award, which was won in binding arbitration. Union boss Bill Gault lives in the 169th.

“The first thing I told them,” Kralle said of his meeting with Local 22 officials, “is that I have no allegiances to Mayor Nutter.”

On the issue of education, Kralle favors an elected school board in Philadelphia.

“The political appointees are just not cutting it,” he said.

Kralle favors increases in the Educational Improvement Tax Credit and other measures to give parents and students choices when faced with attending a public school that is unsafe or has subpar educational standards.

“I’m in support of full school vouchers,” he said.

Kralle has also campaigned on toughening laws against sexual predators. He said it was appropriate for Jerry Sandusky to receive a sentence that will likely keep him in prison until he dies.

“I’m pleased that that monster will not have contact with children anymore,” he said.

Neilson said his service on the House Children and Youth and Veterans Affairs and Emergency Preparedness committees is rewarding. He’s proud that he reads long bills and hasn’t missed a vote.

Neilson is the prime sponsor of a half-dozen bills.

One would allow a school to punish students who bully classmates on the Internet. He cited the bullying of a 15-year-old student at a local charter school. Some students made an unflattering YouTube video about the girl. The ringleader of the bullies has left the school, and the abuse has stopped.

“It’s been very satisfying,” Neilson said of the outcome.

Neilson also is pushing a bill to include physical and mental disabilities as a protected class in the ethnic intimidation law. He’s also in favor of a bill to prevent the release of prisoners until their electronic monitoring devices are set up. And he wants to use gambling proceeds to establish a fund to pay tipsters who identify the killers of law enforcement officers.

“It’s a little motivation. They’re going to want a piece of that money,” Neilson said. ••

 

Subscribe to comments feed Comments (4 posted)

avatar
Concerned 10/22/2012 2:02 pm
I find it troubling as a charter school employee that Mr. Neilson is referencing a situation that he had absolutely no involvement in at all. Moreover, after an extensive investigation with an independent law firm, the claims of bullying against the students were ruled completely unfounded. One of the students who was accused left the school because she moved out of Philadelphia. Mr. Neilson had NOTHING to do with this and is claiming credit as a means to "look good" in the eyes of voters. Why was the outcome "deeply satisfying" to Mr. Neilson? I am confused.
Reply Thumbs Up Thumbs Down
-5
Report as inappropriate
avatar
FEDEX 10/26/2012 12:12 am
Concerned......I find your comments troubling. That fact that a charter school employee would publicaly discuss this issue is a violation of privacy laws. Does the " C" in concerned stand for CEO? We both know that privacy laws are broken everyday at the school
avatar
Concerned Mother 10/25/2012 9:09 pm
I find it " troubling "as the parent of the victim in this situation that a school employee would post a comment that is completely false. My daughter was victimized and this was proven . The girls involved were suspended. An independent investigation was triggered because of her father's position at the school . It was NOT to investigate the bullying episode. I know because I have several emails to confirm this. I am curious as to how an employee would have knowledge of this " extensive investigation " because it was not made public. We as the victims parents weren't allowed to review this report even after we requested to see it. Also I do not see were Mr. Neilson claimed credit or is trying to make himself " look good ". He showed compasison for our daughter and our family . He is working to prevent this from happening again to any other student. I hope this clears up any confusion for you . I can assure you I will notify school of your concerned comments and maybe they can help clear up any confusion for you.
avatar
Rudy Gonzales 10/17/2012 10:10 pm
Gerrymandering districts by politicians has played into politics repeatedly over the years. Population trends ten years ago do not reflect today's population mix. Political gerrymandering excluding certain groups or populations reek of power appropriations. These actions result in disenfranchisement of certain populations through improperly splitting of the vote. Every race grouping should have their representation based on percentages of the populations.
In the same vein, Mitt Romney, Paul Ryan and a host of other TEA-Republican's want to do away with mortgage interest deductions, Charitable deductions, health premium deductions and the other allowable deductions in the current tax code effect middle and lower class and are limited after adjusted gross income. The effect is already minimized! These same people do not address pre-adjusted gross income points at all. THAT is where the real corrections should be implemented. The adjusted gross income includes taxable interest already limited as per previously passed tax code writing, Ordinary dividends already limited as per previously passed tax code writing, Qualified dividends already limited as per previously passed tax code writing, Business income already limited with tax code allowances including those above, Capital gains, which has it's own form full of limitations. That is where tax code clean up and modifications should occur.
Reply Thumbs Up Thumbs Down
-1
Report as inappropriate
total: 2 | displaying: 1 - 2

Post your comment

Please enter the code you see in the image:

Captcha
  • Email to a friend Email to a friend
  • Print version Print version
  • Plain text Plain text

Tagged as:

No tags for this article

Image gallery

Rate this article

0