Northeast Times: Why did you choose to come to Philadelphia as police commissioner?
Charles Ramsey: I was anxious to get back into policing. I had been out of it for a year. I didnt realize I would miss it as much as I did, but I did miss it. I had a chance to meet Mayor Nutter. I was very impressed with him. We hit it off right away. I knew that it would be a city that would undergo a transformation and I wanted to be a part of it.
NT: What differences do you see between the job in Philadelphia and your previous assignments?
CR: The biggest difference is the degree of federal presence in D.C. and the complexity of running (the police department) when you have to deal with so many issues, especially post 9/11. Crimefighting-wise, I dont think there is a unique challenge posed by Philadelphia. I think the challenge is pretty much getting a handle on the violent crime, getting the violent criminals off the street. If theres anything unique, its the amount of guns that you see here and lax gun laws, which is unusual at least with respect to the two jurisdictions where I worked previously. That part of it is different.
NT: What gun laws would you like to see enacted and enforced?
CR: I just think we need reasonable gun laws. We need to have registration of handguns. We need to have a requirement for people to report guns lost or stolen. I think there should be a limit on the amount of guns a person can buy in a months period of time. Im talking about handguns. I think there ought to be a ban on assault-type weapons. Those I dont think serve any useful purpose if youre not in the military.
NT: What pressure are you under to lower the murder rate and reduce violent crime quickly?
CR: I dont know if Id describe it as pressure. I certainly have a desire to do all I can and I dont think people should have to wait a year or two years or whatever. But its not going to be an overnight solution to the problems. The problems are pretty complex. But I also believe that we can make a significant impact and were going to work as hard as we can and let the results speak for themselves at the end of the year. . . . If we could drive the numbers down this year, the question becomes how far we can drive them down next year. We want to keep moving forward.
NT: What do you hope to accomplish with your recent reorganization of the police departments command structure?
CR: Better workflow. Over a period of time, it seems like the department pretty much just stuck units in different places that made no sense. For an example, one of my deputy commissioners was in charge of internal affairs and gun-control strategies. I had to figure out how those two mixed together, and they dont. . . . You also want to have a semblance of accountability. Who do you go to if theres an issue? You want to have a structure where the person has the responsibility and the accountability for results.
NT: How did you decide what people to put in which jobs?
CR: I think thats probably the most difficult thing, getting a round peg in a round hole. Fortunately, weve got talent in the department, so I didnt feel the need to bring in hordes of people from the outside. But it is a challenge to find people that are suited for certain positions: investigations for example vs. patrol. Some people are good at investigations, maybe not so good in patrol. Some people are good in patrol, maybe not so good in investigations.
NT: What can we infer about the commanders who were moved from one area of the department to another?
CR: I really do believe that if you want to demonstrate your abilities, then you need to be in a district somewhere where I can see what you can do. I think the patrol function is the core function. (Thats) just the opposite of some who think the way to go up in the department is through specialized units. For me, the way to move up is patrol, and I think I showed that with the reorganization in who was chosen to head up a lot of these different positions.
NT: Mayor Nutter has proposed giving police "stop-and-frisk" power in high-crime areas as a method to weed out illegal guns. Critics of stop-and-frisk say it violates civil rights and could lead to a litany of lawsuits against the city. What do you think?
CR: I think its a very useful tool. I think the challenge is stopping the right people. Youve got to know who the thugs are, who the people are who illegally carry guns, who are out there committing robberies, doing shootings and so forth. Those are the ones you want to stop. You dont want to alienate the decent law-abiding citizens, but you do need to get out there and get those guns. I believe in going after criminals. Thats what you have to do. They cause too much harm to the public. Im all for programs to try to save folks, but thats not my primary mission. You know, by the time the 911 call is made, its a little late for salvation.
Next week, Commissioner Ramsey will offer his views on redrawing police districts, funding the department, combating the "stop snitching" mentality, violence against officers, proposed waterfront casinos and how his anti-crime plan will affect Northeast Philly.
Reporter William Kenny can be reached at 215-354-3031 or bkenny@phillynews.com